Key Statutory Rules & Public Aviation Law Summary
When you fly on two different airlines on a connecting ticket and your bag is lost, both airlines often point fingers at each other. Article 36 gives you a clear legal weapon.
- Under Article 36(3) of the Montreal Convention 1999 (Successive Carriage), as regards checked baggage, the passenger has a statutory right of action against the FIRST carrier, the LAST carrier, AND the carrier which performed the carriage during which the destruction, loss, damage, or delay took place.
- Article 36(3) explicitly states that 'these carriers will be jointly and severally liable to the passenger'—meaning neither the first nor the final airline can legally refuse your claim by telling you to contact the other airline!
- What Are Your Rights When a Flight Lands at an Alternative Airport?
- Departure Time vs Door-Opening Arrival Time (Germanwings v Henning C-452/13)
- Every Ticketed Child and Infant (Even on a 10% Lap Fare) Qualifies for Full Compensation
- Why the Passenger Who Suffered the Delay (Not the Employer Who Bought the Ticket) Owns the Claim
- Why Online Travel Agencies (OTAs) Cannot Block Your Statutory Claim Against the Airline
Public Statutory Information Disclaimer: AeroStatute provides general public educational information regarding Regulation (EC) No 261/2004, UK261, the Montreal Convention 1999, Canada APPR, and US DOT regulations. This tool does not provide formal legal advice or act as a law firm.